> but we cannot tell how much of it is attributable to the Android.
My understanding is that GOOG was making a ton of money from their Maps and YouTube applications on iOS (from knowing where their customers are and what they're looking at).
I'm willing to pay/donate for my iOS Apps and I think that developers realize that Apple consumers are more willing on that side. The Android App marketplace is more of a wild-west thing.
The Android is already outselling the iPhone by a mile.
Yes, but the only profitable handset maker there is Samsung. Samsung is vertical. They have their own apps processor with Exynos and they're most likely designing their own CPU microarchitecture as they hired a bunch of veteran architects from AMD and Freescale for their Austin CPU design center - most notably, the chief architect of Bobcat.
If you are just an SOC vendor and your customers are unprofitable, you're going to have a problem in the long term.
TI sees this and gave up.
2/3rds of Qualcomm's profit comes from QTL which is patent licencing. The other 1/3 is from QCT where the majority of that is from modem silicon (Branded as Gobi and used in iPhones among others). Snapdragon makes money, but it's a smaller piece of Qualcomm's earnings than you might think.
Nvdia has never been cash-flow positive in their Tegra business.
Intel is fighting for a shrinking piece of the pie as Apple and Samsung dominate the space.
Of course, things could change as phones start to become the primary computing device for people.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
