Replies to post #23136 on Salamon Group, Inc. (fka SLMU)

[Andrew John]

sunbits
i am agreeing with your post, but the most disturbing and disaapointing thing here is that with ALL the lawuits, ALL the bickering among insiders, ALL the false promises made by MM & DSTI and, ALL the past failures of MM, it leads me to believe that this lawsuit will just fall into another failure and inconsequential 'thing' that will have no benefit to shareholders.

I still think the most promising thing for SLMU is in fact the ARISE TEHCNOLOGIES business. I also stand behind my opinion that MM must go.

I can not not confirm the following opinion, but here is what my 'INVESTING SPECULATION' tells me: Deals like the one SMLU announced with GM were misleading. Deals SLMU announced with city, state and government agencise were misleading. When I use the term 'misleading', I think the press press releases were not-truthful and/or border line flat-out lies.

On Thursday (October 4) I asked my broker to call WILLIAM NALLEY of the ORSAy Group. The reason i asked him to call is because he can record the conversation. I have done this 4 other times...Mr Nalley has knowlingly avoided conversations with my broker. I believe he tells LIES to retail investors and avoids institutional investors and brokers. If a public company or their representatives and consultants are not willing to speak with institutional investors, they are HIDING THINGS or have absolutely nothing good to say.

NALLEY probably knows he can get aaway with more BS to retail investors because retail investors have little to no recourse regarding their discussions.

My broker for the past 4 months has made calls, sent emails to NALLEY to no avail.....This is a SIGN of BAD THINGS.

[sunbits]

Celt
There is NO QUESTION that all is not above board. There is NO QUESTION that no value has yet been captured from the announced projects. There is NO QUESTION that the lawsuits flying back and forth will one day be resolved. And there is NO QUESTION that SLMU is not an operating company in the true sense of the word...its still just a shell with more pawns.

When we see consecutive quarters with real revenues, we will then see a real company emerge. I suspect we will one day see that, yet it won't be very very soon. Rather the value of this lawsuit is to try to capture value from what moves were made early on by the CEO and Chairman of SLMU. Because he holds still the largest amount of shares under his control and therefore retains an incentive to increase those shares values. This is one way of attempting to do that.

If I were GM and the funds backing Visole, I'd buy him out for a nice tidy sum and make him go away. They have that power..they simply have to decide if they want to use it or not...