With all due respect - This could mean anything: "Aaron Russo saying that he was told by Nelson Rockefeller 11 months before 9/11 that there would be this big event and that we'd be invading Afganistan and Iraq and that soldiers would be looking for people in caves in Afghanistan and Pakistan and there would be a war on terror in which there is no real enemy.. etc etc.. that part starts just after the 2 min mark...
about all a person can say about this is he's lying or he's telling the truth. "
It could mean either, or as is most likely the case: This Does Not Mean He Was Speaking of 9/11!
Facts are not could be, could have been, might be or would be this big event; they are direct; this is a fact. With all of the chitt from the many lands of sand and all of the threats from those in those lands, that was quite an easy and vague prediction to make. How many threats did Saddam make? How many threats from Al Qaeda and the Taliban and other Islamic Radicals were there for years and months before the tragedy of 9/11?
We knew there were threats, and for a very long time; during the Clinton administration there we had plenty of threats, and in fact had attacks that went pretty much ignored. Look at your own post; ‘we were warned 11-months before of an attack.’ Well remember, Bush was only in office for 8-months; we don’t know what the Clinton administration told him. I mean really, we know one thing for sure about the Clinton's though; Lies, Cover-Ups and Secrets are part of their game.
Again, as before, I'm not agreeing or disagreeing. I'm just saying that was a rather easy prediction to make, much like a Fortune Teller could do. Current conditions, many threats, attacks already happening; I guess we all knew to some degree we would be in war with either, both or possibly even more countries from that region.
**************** Progressiveness Must Die Today, In Order That We May Be Free Tomorrow
Market Data 
Markets 
******** 
AI
