Crow When are you going to admit that you are talking in circles
Integrating the Verimed into the process, as you say, adds nothing to the medicine itself. The process flow chart shows that it is used after the mixing of the dosages by the Tecnicians, and coincident with the step where the Pharmacist himself takes the responsibility of affixing labels and certification before delivering the dosages to the wards.
Now if the Pharmacist depends upon the verimed machine to do his job for him, then FDA approval and the liability insurance definitely should be had. But if he does not rely upon the machine, then it is really useless.
Read what it says the pharmicist himself takes the responsibility.Does he look at it and say O'k Does he sniff it does he drink it . He can only rely on the technician to mix it right. ValiMed is not expected to affix labels ,but to make damn sure the stuff is mixed to specifications,and that the pharmacist can not do . That is why there have been accidents. they were relying on technicians and a verification by a pharmacist that trusted the technician.
Let me now say this I may be a geezer but then you don't know s33t,especially if you can't see the ValiMed scenario.
You also posted the July PR .
ValiMed has gone beyond that Motts test,note: they arebeing UTILIZED, (that means USED) in the Motts facility,look ma ,no FDA approval and now they have been accepted in the main hospital after two more months of testing
I apologize for telling you I didn't ask an administrator to relieve you.TOO many boards I did ask on the silicon board ,and got suspended.
IMO IT does not make sense
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
