News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Crow3

10/03/05 12:07 PM

#4601 RE: INET6 #4600

FDA approval could be said to be third party verification.

The unsupported word of a Pharmacist in a Children's hospital?

Not.

Now if there were a board of pharmacists and doctors came into the hospital and observed the use of the machine, and set up a protocol whereby the machine is put through all of its paces, and such things as speed and accuracy verified, and false positives and negatives if any recorded and duly noted, recovery time between tests, and cost/benefit ratios
determined..then it could be said that third party verification has been completed, with a moderately high degree of confidence.

But who would convene such a board, and pay for the study?

The real question that has to be answered is, can enough of the machines be sold to make a difference in the continued survival of the company? How many Hospital boards can be persuaded that the machine would be useful enough to make
the cost justified? The answer has to be MANY if the company is to survive.

A very hard sell in my estimation.



icon url

rottenapple

10/03/05 12:20 PM

#4603 RE: INET6 #4600

INET...Can you honestly believe that the University of Michigan hospitals would risk injecting a patient with an unapproved solution validation,

No they would not! Think FDA approval & Product Liability Insurance. CDEX has yet to address those issues! FDA approval is time consuming and PLI costs lots of money. CDEX has neither time or money on their side.

Out for the day.
icon url

d4diddy

10/03/05 2:26 PM

#4610 RE: INET6 #4600

INET, what is wrong with you people!!!??? What does THIRD Party mean to you? LMAO!