News Focus
News Focus
icon url

arbpro

10/03/05 11:17 AM

#7282 RE: EPROM #7281

Wow Eprom you really are desperate aren't you. Let's take each of my assertions and analyze them. OK?

(NWAU) own NO intellectual property?
Is this statement true or false? Does Navicom own any intellectual property? No it does not.

All you can do is sell somebody else's units
Is this what NWAU does? Yes it is exactly what NWAU does!

commodity distributor you MUST be the low cost provider. Show me a blueprint that verifies that Navicom can ever be the low cost provider.
Do you disagree that in order to succeed in a commodity business you must be a low cost provider? If so, you are rewriting the laws relating to the distribution of commodity products. Has Navicom ever offered any rationale as to how it can provide units at a cost lower than competition? No it hasn't!

Otherwise, Navicom is a big ZERO
Now I guess in your tortured manner of reasoning you deduce therefrom that the Company being a zero is the same as never selling a unit. Geeeeshhh. Are you that desperate? Man, I don't really know what to say. I have NEVER said that Navicom would never sell a gps unit and you can't produce any quote where I say that. The reference to ZERO is that Navicom will not deliver the EPS necessary to justify NWAU being at 1.45 per share. Those longs believing that Navicom will deliver them to the promise land are deluding themselves. Navicom will be lucky if it is ever a profitable segment of NWAU's business. It is a ZERO. It owns no patents, employs no engineers, owns no factory, designs no units, possesses no intellectual property. It is a high cost distributor of a commodity item. It is a ZERO. I never said that it would never sell a unit and you damn well know it.

NOW FOR THE 3rd TIME: HOW CAN NWAU FORECASTS GOING OUT 18 MONTHS BE BELIEVED IF THEIR 60 DAY FORECASTS ARE OFF BY 50%?