News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Art Vandeley

09/16/12 5:01 PM

#25003 RE: greens12 #24999

ML does not own any shares of MJNA. So how can the feds take what isn't his. They can take his shares of cannabank, he isn't even sole owner there.
icon url

Bbushoveb

09/16/12 5:03 PM

#25006 RE: greens12 #24999

You have access to the case files?
icon url

StevenRisk

09/16/12 5:04 PM

#25007 RE: greens12 #24999

According to the indictment, Loomis used Michael Llamas, 27, of Tracy, and Peter Woodard, 54, Ventura, to approach builders of new homes and developers of condominiums to purchase investment homes in bulk at substantial price discounts ranging from 30 to 50 percent off under the terms of an “option contract.” Llamas and Woodard had no financial ability and no intention of purchasing the homes; rather, the homes were to be sold to Loomis’s nominee members at full price. Loomis then arranged for his mortgage company, Nationwide Lending Group (NLG), to sell mortgage loans for the nominees with banks and other lenders at the full price of the homes without disclosing the large price discount. Lenders were thereby misled into advancing loans that far exceeded their lending guidelines. Also, the large option contract price discount was used to conceal the lack of required down payments by nominee buyers. Loomis, Llamas, and Woodard split what remained of the price discount after subtraction of the fake down payments and certain fees.

I do not see this as black & white as you do. M.L. would have been 21-22 years old when this took place. M.L. approached builders looking for a discount. M.L. was working for Loomis and in all reality did not vilolate as alleged. Obviously anyone with 1/2 brain knows anybody at that age did not have the financial means to finance these deals including the builders. Notice Loomis had arranged for his mortgage company to sell morgtage loans. The more I look the more I see M.L. as being used by loomis for his own personal gain. The indicment against M.L. almost looks like they need more witnesses IMO.
icon url

SonarX2

09/16/12 6:15 PM

#25051 RE: greens12 #24999

So.. there's a commercial out there 'bout believing everything one reads or sees on the internet. Guess one could easily fall into that category .. but what I read was the last line on the U.S. Attny's indictment(if in fact that piece of reading mtl is correct) that of course, all persons charged are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Something that seems to be missing in all of this discussion about ML.. Didn't he say (in his interview) that he was just an investor who lost a pile of money because of other persons mishandling of $$?.
Anyway, I've put a call in to Stuart Smith and I'm waiting for his feedback on all of this. I'm sure he'll be in touch with ML if he hasn't already done so. My guess (If ML really hasn't knowingly committed any crimes)is.. we'll be hearing something fairly soon.