News Focus
News Focus
icon url

vero

09/11/12 7:37 AM

#275671 RE: rufio #275670

That sounds interesting Rufio...
http://www.toumaz.com/news.php?id=130
Vero
icon url

success622

09/11/12 9:41 AM

#275676 RE: rufio #275670

Thumbs up on your rational thought process, rufio.
Very clear, and well-laid out.
icon url

Poptech

09/11/12 10:06 AM

#275677 RE: rufio #275670

rufio:

I think you are talking about a joint development agreement.

When you start a joint venture, you create a third entity owned by the two companies. The cash infusion would go into the third company and it would have a separate staff. Each company would provide cash and assets to the third company and share it is profits in relationship to their ownership.

NeoMedia has no assets that it can contribute - they are all locked to NeoMedia and YA. So they can contribute a license to patents and maybe code. However, the new company needs a CEO, CFO, Chief of Development, Quality control, etc. so the new company needs cash which NeoMedia could source from YA.

Nantworks is an incubator. So Nantworks provides a small amount of cash (less than $50,000), the Nant brand, office space, conference rooms, advisers, and maybe some infrastructure equipment such as wireless and office phones. The companies that sign up provide Nant income for the life of the venture.

A joint development agreement could mean NeoMedia gets paid to develop products for another company. They hire a team and are paid as they meet client's milestones. So, NeoMedia would receive the revenue and the third part was receive whatever is developed.
icon url

lesnshawn

09/11/12 11:05 AM

#275681 RE: rufio #275670

rufio: Good thinking and spot on as far as a plausible outcome is concerned. No way was Dr. Soon's initial investment here was for the mere sport of flipping pennies as some here opine.

lns