Replies to post #147479 on Biotech Values

[Robert C Jonson]

Although you were being sarcastic, today’s SA article is in fact a pretty good summary of the recent price action.

It is if you count today's price acton only. It's only purpose was to mount a short attack, and it did that very well. Almost 6 million people bought shares in PPHM today, many of whom probably wouldn't have bought w/o that article. If you were part of that, congratulations!

[honestabe13]

Dew..

it was certainly an agenda-driven article by an admitted shorter. it's legal, of course, but since you agree that the facts aren't rock-solid ('minor misstatements' is open to debate regarding how minor those missttements are aside from evaluations of TA), it's not necessarily about the science.

as i've said before, that should not be lumped in automatically with the financials at this point relative to old history with PPHM's BOD.

the PPHMers may be wrong, yet again...but there is no place for egos now. it's 'fish or cut bait' for PPHM within 30 days. Let that settle these catfights. fair enough?

[oldberkeley]

When asked what he meant by a miracle:

"Oh, anything with a probability of less than 20%." — Enrico Fermi