Here I disagree with you quite a lot, mlsoft. The moral answer should involve recognition of what are the consequences of federally outlawing abortions. Are we to accept religious vigilantees acting as judge, jury and executioners? Will the consequences of outlawing abortion simply create a state where those capable of shouldering the financial "burden" of abortion avail themselves to safe abortions while those less fortunate, lose the ability of having children in the future, or worse, lose their lives?
Even very religious people must accept the fact that many people, including religious people are infractions on biblical or other religious law. Why select abortion and homosexuality as the one most requiring federal intervention. If one accepts (and some do) the tenet, that life begins with the first independent breath, as Genesis dictates, than abortion is no worse than masturbation (both infractions on the dictum of "though shall multiply") and homosexuality is no worse than "cooking a kid in his mother's milk (both "abominations" before God, because pagans were practicing same as part of pagan rituals). Are we going to send the police to check who masturbated the night before or who had meat with milk?
Literal reading and enforcement of the bible may require such, do we really want such a federal intervention in our lives?
Zeev
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
