gdepc, I should've said "If it's true . . .
that CYGX needs another backbone to make its products work, MS would be a fool to announce it in a forum like the interview with Wall Street Reporter."
I didn't bring up the issue in the first place -- I believe it was happycamper who did that -- and I don't know whether it's true. However, I think the quote found by arnold gives it some credence. ("Negotiations are being conducted to obtain the rights to use a further identified alternative backbone in combination with the sequences we have discovered and found successful.")
I will admit, though, that the significance of this sentence is very uncertain, and, as is typical of their pitiful IR, the company hasn't bothered to clarify it.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
