News Focus
News Focus
icon url

TheCiscoKidd

09/21/05 12:38 AM

#4064 RE: ontheedge01 #4062

LOL!!!

"Every sb-2 has addessed the fact of no lawsuits, known or pending. Any lawsuit or settlement that was brought against CDEX would have had to be reported."

Gosh, let's think about this one... it's not too difficult... LOL!!!

Why do you think that LOCH/CDEx wanted to handle these settlements without any lawsuits ?

Why do you think that LOCH/CDEx wanted to handle these settlements without anything going to court ?

Why do you think LOCH/CDEx wanted the APA to stop all the settlemnts???


Hello??? McFly???

Think about it, and you will go... "Oh yeah!!! Now I understand why there is nothing in the filings!!!"

Give it a week... I bett you understand!

LOL!!!!!!!!

~Kidd
~OUT
icon url

TheCiscoKidd

09/21/05 12:46 AM

#4065 RE: ontheedge01 #4062

"How obvious has he painted himself on this one"

My guess, from reading your posts, is that English is your second language, so I will not "critter-size" you... butt I bet you meant to say... "It is obvious that he has painted himself into a corner on this one"... not he has "painted himself" LOL!!! That's precious tho !!!

As in... "OnTheEdge really painted himself into a corner when he got caught red-handed answering one of Malcolm's emails from Malcolm's email address".

There, no charge for the English lesson.

Now, when you learn about settlements and how they are to the advantage of companies to keep "information" from going to court and becoming public knowledge, we can discuss your inaccurate theory.

Fair enuff?

I gotta go paint...

You... Keep selling those PP shares to the innocent.

~Kidd
~out