News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jq1234

08/02/12 10:29 PM

#146521 RE: mcbio #146519

Daclatasvir had been tested in many more patients and in different combinations including nuc before. Safety issue hadn't come up. In addition, BMY singled out INX189 trials rather than daclatasvir trials to stop, thus at minimum they didn't think daclatasvir likely to be responsible.
icon url

ciotera

08/03/12 6:56 AM

#146532 RE: mcbio #146519

Re: daclatasvir

If daclatasvir was the issue I think they'd be suspending the Quad trial too (ifn+rbv+daclatasvir+asunaprevir)

Addendum: I see that this quesion has been already fully addressed.
icon url

genisi

08/03/12 6:57 AM

#146533 RE: mcbio #146519

How do we know daclatasvir isn't the issue

In addition to what jq1234 pointed out (on the more extensive clinical data available for daclatasvir), there may also have been signs for the very same tox observed in the phase II trial, in the preclinical data of the nuke but not the NS5A. That would strongly suggest which drug is the issue.