i found the article you mentioned. it has an error in it, if you look at page 15 of this .pdf you will see that the real number is a minus 6.2%, not a positive 6.2%. i thought it was strange that it was the only article that mentioned it as a positive. But whatever... even if it were positive, it is a miniscule rate compared to the what the last republican borrow-and-spend idiot did. and since many of Rmoneys advisors are bush retreads, you would get more government than you bargained for if you go back to that scenario.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
