Replies to post #14627 on Mindpix Corp. (fka MPIX)

[Draconis]

I talk to the TA more than she would like me to.

You're funny! I'm awake, but I'll take your advice in the morning. Here's some for you. It's time to make the dough......nuts! Think of it this way. When MPIX takes off like a bat out of hell, because Diante makes it great, I'll be laughing all the way to the bank. EMXC owns a high percentage of MPIX. We shall see who has the last laugh here.

Let us hope this doesn't turn sour like EMXC as the poor "TRACK RECORD" shows.

[unconvinced]

Were the initial 400 million shares paid to the officers of Emax Media (ie. Roxanna and crew) in exchange for the licensing of the music library restricted when they were issued in late June of 2011 or weren't they? Yes they were, according to the Merger announcement on June 29th 2011.

eMax Media shareholders will exchange forty million (40,000,000) shares of its restricted common stock (the "eMax Media Shares") for four hundred million (400,000,000) shares of restricted common stock in MINDPIX

http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=48252600

However, OTC was updated on June 22nd by Roxanna where it stated the O/S was approximately 623 million shares and the Float is approximately 336 million shares. That means only 287 million shares of the O/S is restricted, not the original 400 million as you claim. I am not speculating here. I am just doing the math. So that means, at least 113 million shares were restricted and are not restricted any longer. I don't see why you are arguing with me on this. These are her numbers I'm using.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/MPIX/company-info

Now, I am speculating that there is a correlation between the recent high volume and the recently unrestricted shares but that's the whole reason I posted to see what everyone thought about it.

-unconvinced