Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,173.91
(
0.12%
)
US TECH 100
26,569.20
(
0.00%
)
Dow Jones
49,310.32
(
0.00%
)
Brent Oil
104.42
(
2.26%
)
Bitcoin
76,797.47
(
-0.74%
)
News Focus
News Focus

Replies to post #93034 on Pacific Gold Corp fka PCFG

Replies to #93034 on Pacific Gold Corp fka PCFG
icon url

BBalls-N-CowTown

07/07/12 9:20 AM

#93036 RE: blue dog #93034

Thank you Blue Dog. We really appreciate it!
icon url

TRAPPER JIM

07/07/12 9:46 AM

#93037 RE: blue dog #93034

Thank you blue dog.Very Much Appreciated.
icon url

foxwoodsfan

07/07/12 10:31 AM

#93039 RE: blue dog #93034

Very, very much appreciated!
icon url

lumnari

07/07/12 3:04 PM

#93040 RE: blue dog #93034

Add my thanks. Looking forward to your post. A valuable asset to the Message Board.
icon url

blue dog

07/12/12 1:13 PM

#93654 RE: blue dog #93034

Sorry for the delay: no change in docket since June 15.

Couple things:

1. A subset of the docket is available at http://client-email.com/dockets/PCFGvBME.html ; if anyone wants documents not listed, please feel free to let me know.

2. I am not your lawyer unless we have a written engagement letter, signed by both of us.

3. I have not had a chance to review the documents. Too busy. I am sorry about that. One thing to keep in mind as you read them is that you (like the judge) must distinguish between advocacy and accuracy. In other words, reading just one side's papers may sound very convincing. By the same token, reading the other side's papers may sound equally convincing. But only one side is going to win on any given issue.

I still look forward to taking a look at these myself, and I have not checked each link. Let me know if there are any technical problems; let your lawyer know if you have any legal questions.
GL