Replies to post #78491 on e.Digital Corporation (fka EDIG)

[LawyerLong]

Two thoughts:

1. Those companies clearly were not named EDIG as the courts and settlements have already spoken to the value of their patents. $0.00 as of the last litigation and markman ruling.

2. I'd be interested in knowing the name of a company which had one patent and created shareholder value for those who owned its stock. Let us know.

LL

[Neverending]

1Coyote- I might be as optimistic as you are about EDIG making enough of future settlements to impact the share price BUT the licensing and litigation effort is not new. Any new litigation will be the THIRD attempt. You will remember the first one in Texas ducked a Markman, in my opinion because Duane Morris knew they would "lose" and they wanted to milk the nuisance value settlements. These settlements are profitable for them but not enough revenue to help the share price. In the second round in Colorado EDIG said they were going to raise the bar on licenses and as it turned out the license fees appeared to actually be less. The Markman ruling ended the effort here and it looked like many companies got off without even paying a nuisance fee. Now once again and as always full of optimistic statements about strengthened patents EDIG moves forward!

[murgirl]

No ram no ram no ram no ram ...no infringers

Amended claims on patents that soon expire and no ram no ram no ram

There is such a thing as licensing patents that are pending ...no sale no sale no sale
For nearly two years on tech that should be in demand two years ago IF Indeed it was in demand! Again...no sale no sale no sale!