News Focus
News Focus
icon url

DewDiligence

07/02/12 2:15 PM

#144916 RE: biomaven0 #144915

But presumably [M402] will represent a fair chunk of their unpartnered R&D expense from here on out.

That’s an artificial metric that answers the wrong question.

During the next few years, MNTA’s out-of-pocket R&D costs for the FoB programs will dwarf its expenditures on M402; although some or all of MNTA’s R&D for FoB’s will eventually flow back to MNTA in the form of milestone payments from BAX for pre-submission technical achievements, the FoB programs are where MNTA has to pay attention to the ticking cost meter.

Not so for M402, which isn’t a material drain on MNTA’s liquidity and won’t be for some time.
icon url

bladerunner1717

07/02/12 2:36 PM

#144917 RE: biomaven0 #144915

Peter,

I heard Dew wrote a letter to MNTA's management telling them that oncology was a sucker's bet. (Jus kiddin...LOL)

Bladerunner