News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Flyguy

06/27/12 11:56 AM

#259685 RE: tom favata #259684

So tell us Tom why would Joe want to settle with you? What part of the court proceedings are you involved with except as a person who claims they have been sent bad e-mails? Please help us all understand, for as it stands now you walter and ron are all in deep with this protection order. Thats it.
icon url

joecanouse

06/27/12 11:57 AM

#259686 RE: tom favata #259684

well again misinformation on court proceedings

1. motion for sj brought by q against jd two counts
2. motion for subpoena brought by q to get docs fr q attorney
3. motion to compel defendant and bradley re shareholder mtg
4. motion to dismiss brought by q re complaint by nhs

nothing against quasar; scare tactics again by you but who really thinks you know what is going on as you are not an officer or director of either company and were just used to fund jeff and ms
icon url

texkengold

06/27/12 12:12 PM

#259688 RE: tom favata #259684

dissapointed with the results you think you will get... QASP will be toast just like JC promised after the court proceedings

"dissapointed with the results you think you will get", wow tom thats strong stuff you chat on the quasar message board....
at least commonshareholders know exactly where you stand now, no doubt in that stance...

why would you say quasar is lost to a shareholder one week b4 digenova takes over, and answer my question..

when did you and jeffrey digenova decide "the idea" to purchase the nhsh shell on dec 17 2010... while digenova was a ceo of quasar... in sept 2010? or b4 that? you remember... so throw out the date....in a answer to my question
your turn
tex jmho