Replies to post #20456 on Cyclone Power Technologies, Inc. (fka CYPW)

[now invest]

How does GAME CHANGING RELATE TO CYPW???? I haven't seen one verifiable GAME CHANGER !! NOT ONE HUGE CONTRACT!!! LOTS OF PRS AND AWARDS... BUT NO REAL MONEY!!

REAL INVESTORS WANT A TRACK RECORD AND GOOD HISTORY ON MEETING WHAT PRs SAY.....

AS FAR AS ME?? I am watching looking for a "ray of hope"....

Look AT THE STOCK.... NEWSNEWSNEWS... and CYPW IS AGAIN DOWN TO .15... SO I WOULD SAY THE WORLD OF INVESTORS DON'T SEE ANY GAME CHANGING HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Remember it is NOT like CYPW isn't known!! Why are RAYTHEON people who are NOT involved with the ordering of equipment BUYING??

How About all the CAR PEOPLE talking about it?? The Solar company people?? The BIG NEW VENTURE from Australia??.... ??? NO BUYING!!!!!!!!! NO ATTENTION!!! Hasn't even traded 500 dollars yet TODAY... Game changer... LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL



Any Tech, Can be leap frogged.... Don't bring it to market and something new comes out... Any Tech Company can go Backrupt NOT generating cash!!!

[littemickey]

Good Grief Charlie Brown!!! How many times does Lucy have to pull the ball before you kick it when you get the picture. Your hundreds of billions would only be true if it is reflected in the share price. That is the actual "scorecard". Not some imaginary number pulled out of the air. Patents have a limited life span. They only matter if their is a product to attach the patent to. If no products appear then the patent is useless. How many patents are 1/2 way to expiration? This is why I am pushing for a product for mass production. Please keep in mind many of investors that are bound to purchase common shares expect the voting rights that come with them. Until CYPW makes this no cost no dilution act the stock will not draw large and institutional investors no matter how how many glowing reports show up. Large account money managers believe (and rightly so) that if some tragedy befalls the operation leadership they have the right to say how things go forward. Stock companies are supposed to survive the loss of key people and the shareholders should have a say in their replacements. It is not any but good business. To "put off" this important act is puzzling. I would like to hear an argument against this argument.