Smith, LOL You didn't even bother to deny
my charge that the thoughts contained in the post I criticized are not yours. And I hope that the IR firm that organized that post has some good lawyers because all the "do your own due diligence, I am not posting inside information, and IMO's," will not absolve you if the SEC is looking at this board.
Why didn't you answer the question? Let me repeat it, "IF the company has audited financials for NWAU operations, why do they need to be acquired by a shell?" Since that transaction significantly dilutes the common shareholder, is that not a breach of the company's fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders? How does making a few shell owners rich benefit the interests of shareholders? Either the financials don't exist, or they have been hidden only to enrich shell owners. Which is it?
And insofar as your claim that you are not pumping and dumping is concerned, well your own track record disproves that assertion. At a time when you were on this board, many times a day, stating that NWAU was headed to the promise land, you were busy selling your shares near the high. That is the the definition of "pump and dump." Do you have a different one?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
