Ask youself - but not the legal question, as obviously the "legal" advice on patents has not been very good on this and the BV board. Instead ask the moral question - who did the work behind what part of these approval projects, and how much, and I think you can see that the subject patent - a 'process' patent - is not much to talk about. Now of course morality is not law, but it is a 'fairness' guide to a starting point at which the parties might settle.
So, compared to biotechs where there is much to hope for in terms of paradigm shifts, etc - in this case, I see only a process patent surrounding a generic - really, very, very little.