News Focus
News Focus
icon url

User336447

06/22/12 10:07 PM

#188152 RE: fourkids_9pets #188150

god they need new signals >> if i can decode them so can others



4K, I understand that trades are going back and forth and there are strange similarities and patterns that occur. But when you and your colleague are saying things like this, it totally goes over my head (and I'm sure most others). Can you please explain in a short, concise, paragraph exactly what is going on here behind these codes? What is this code and how does it work? What are they doing? I assume that you believe there are entities manipulating and testing the market. I agree with that, but don't understand L2 language. Please enlighten me and the rest of our readers in plain english if possible.

Chart still seems quite bullish to me.
icon url

Krazy K

06/22/12 10:39 PM

#188155 RE: fourkids_9pets #188150

Someone may be forced to cover before they were hoping to!

A little news and ole shorty is going to really be in trouble.
icon url

User336447

06/23/12 12:45 AM

#188168 RE: fourkids_9pets #188150

The following is my own personal analysis of recent JBII history based on what I see in the chart/SMB/news:

My chart has been telling me that the PROS have been covering at around the $1 range since 09/28/2011. Large buys and/or covers again on 11/22/2011. The most climatically high volume buys and covers on 01/04/2012, 01/05/2011, and 01/12/2012. More buys/covers on 03/15/2012. It appears to me that a large amount of their long term short positions were covered by this time.

Now, in my opinion, around late april, early may, they had to let off the buying/covering to test the market. I think they were noticing too many other retail buyers buying alongside them. What it looks like to me is that during this period, they didn't influence the PPS much and just let it flow however it was gonna flow. It responded neutrally. This is bullish since it was immediately following a downtrend. Momentum had dried up. JBII based at .95 on low volume with no signs of scared retail selling to force it down further. IMO, this is when they confirmed that all of the covering/buying they had been doing was the correct decision. This is why they had to allow for the beginning of an uptrend after the filing of the 10Q. (I strongly believe you are right that they still have sizable long-term short positions yet to be covered)

On 05/14/2012 and 05/15/2012 we saw what I believe to be fairly large amounts of retail buying followed by a swift and aggressive flurry of sells/shorts to stifle the stock from shooting up too far. They wanted to stifle the PPS because they were intending to either cover more shorts or add to their long positions.

Instead of accumulating the shares from frightened and exasperated long-term longs, they are having to switch gears. The 10Q changed the underlying direction of the market and I believe that now instead of attempting to manipulate long term shareholders into selling, they are now focusing on manipulating medium to short-term traders into giving up their shares at inopportune times in a last ditch effort to cover. The true longs are not selling at these levels. The 06/04/2012, 06/06/2012, and 06/07/2012 days (that you called were going to be volume days) were IMO mainly aimed at getting all the medium to short term traders who were buying in May to give up their shares flat or at a loss. They are trying to maximize the accumulation of cheap shares during a drought.

My take on the current situation with the Reg Sho threshold flagging and what not is that these "PROS" are SCRAMBLING to avoid a short squeeze. This stock is a pressure cooker right now and every day we get closer to the AGM, the longs will be lining up. This means there are less and less retail sell orders to absorb with their covers. If they don't have that sell volume, they are essentially toast. IMO, they are using even MORE NSS to manipulate the price to remain low and "inconspicuous" and to attempt to "spark" more sell orders in order to cover at a low price and avoid a short squeeze. It's sort of like fighting fire with fire. I agree with you 4k, these guys must be freaking out- given the threshold flag, it is quite apparent that the 10Q caught them off guard. They are getting sloppy. If we see a short squeeze rally, these guys might lose a LOT of money because said rally just might never stop...
icon url

fourkids_9pets

06/23/12 9:03 AM

#188190 RE: fourkids_9pets #188150

JBII >> day 5

threshold

http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/trader.aspx?id=RegSHOThreshold


Reg SHO & Rule 4320 Status
Date
Reg SHO Threshold Flag

Jun 22, 2012 Yes
Jun 21, 2012 Yes
Jun 20, 2012 Yes
Jun 19, 2012 Yes
Jun 18, 2012 Yes



http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/JBII/short-sales

i'm sure it's all just a *coincidence* >> NOT


===
4kids
all jmo
icon url

fourkids_9pets

06/25/12 11:50 PM

#188434 RE: fourkids_9pets #188150

JBII >> 6/25/2012

daily reg sho link is still not out as of 11:30 this evening
i'll catch up with that tomorrow to see what percentages reveal

JBII trades >> 6/25/2012

$1.1000 300 OTO 15:49:09

$1.1200 250 OTO 15:02:15 long's buy

$1.1100 980 OTO 14:25:02 long's buy
$1.1100 200 OTO 14:23:58

$1.1000 500 OTO 13:55:12
$1.1000 2,000 OTO 13:53:08

$1.1100 150 OTO 13:45:06

$1.1000 500 OTO 12:56:34
$1.1000 175 OTO 12:34:54
$1.1000 500 OTO 12:34:35
$1.1000 500 OTO 11:05:23
$1.1000 225 OTO 10:45:25
$1.1000 4,500 OTO 09:41:39
$1.1000 1,000 OTO 09:41:28

$1.1200 500 OTO 09:40:17

$1.1000 100 OTO 09:30:08


dollar amount ~ $13,644.00


Detailed Quote:JBII
JBI INC NEW
1.10 -0.02 (-1.79 %)AS OF 3:49:09PM ET 06/25/2012


Last Trade 1.10
Trade Time 3:49:09pm ET

Today's Change -0.02
Today's % Change -1.79%


Open 1.10
Today's High 1.12
Today's Low 1.10
Previous Close Price
06/22/2012 1.12

52-Week High
06/27/2011 3.99

52-Week Low
01/05/2012 0.522


Volume 12,380
10-Day Average Volume 46,473
90-Day Average Volume 138,344



if anyone is curious how the eod day was set up

the predictable pattern of (either primary or secondary
doing their thing >> came to pass) CSTI UC on the ask to 1.11
so that a *paint* could be done to bid >> (300 shares .. watch
for a 3k feed tomorrow) >> meaning that even if a *paint* was
done back >> at ask >> JBII would close down 1 tick

and the reason i call this predictable >> is i posted exactly
what would happen on skype >> re: the UC >> the *paint to bid*
(odds are a signal for a coming feed) b4 it actually came to pass
so that (you guessed it) JBII would close down >> cause of course
there is so *much selling* >> you know those most recent round of
investors >> that just filed with the sec bought into P2O
via JBI/JBII >> so they could *sell* or short or whatever the
latest >> er >> *opinion* is >>

riiiiiiiighhhhhht


it will be a rather revealing time between now and the AGM

===
4kids
all jmo