Replies to post #5154 on Zeev's Turnips Talk Politics (ZTTP)

[stunjamie]

And they'd never lie to us would they?

2 nice dossiers presented by the UK so far...the first was basede entirely on military inetlligence (oxymoron) from 1991, the second plagiarised from a Califrnian student's thesis from 1993. This is presented to the UN and the British public as the reason to go forward. Brilliant.

[Dances-W-waves]

From Blix's report:

http://msnbc.com/news/872913.asp

"Another matter, and one of great significance, is that many proscribed weapons and items are not accounted for.
To take an example, a document which Iraq provided suggested to us that some 1,000 tons of chemical agent were unaccounted for. I must not jump to the conclusion that they exist; however, that possibility is also not excluded. If they exist, they should be presented for destruction. If they do not exist, credible evidence to that effect should be presented.
We are fully aware that many governmental intelligence organizations are convinced and assert that proscribed weapons, items and programs continue to exist. The U.S. secretary of state presented material in support of this conclusion.
Governments have many sources of information that are not available to inspectors. The inspectors, for their part, must base their reports only on the evidence which they can themselves examine and present publicly. Without evidence, confidence cannot arise.
Mr. President, in my earlier briefings, I have noted that significant outstanding issues of substance were listed in two Security Council documents from early 1999 and should be well known to Iraq.
I referred, as examples, to the issues of anthrax, the nerve agent VX, and long-range missiles, and said that such issues — and I quote myself — “deserve to be taken seriously by Iraq rather than being brushed aside,” unquote.
The declaration submitted by Iraq on the 7th of December last year, despite its large volume, missed the opportunity to provide the fresh material and evidence needed to respond to the open questions.
This is perhaps the most important problem we are facing. Although I can understand that it may not be easy for Iraq in all cases to provide the evidence needed, it is not the task of the inspectors to find it. Iraq itself must squarely tackle this task and avoid belittling the questions."

The inspectors are being played. Again! Saddam has not complied. Period!!!

How long should the world be held hostage by this man? The time for waiting is over. Again, my statement, and I ask my question:

"Your either with our country or against it on this one.

If your niether, then you better get out of the way.

How many people have to die on american soil, by the hands of our enemy,(I'm pretty sure I can prove that one, or do you want a link?) before you would say the same thing? I'm curious.
Or would you ever say that?"

[michael03332002]

No, cant and dont have the TIME for the links, just the people that have escaped his tyranny. But somehow they are all liars, right?

He really is not killing or torturing anyone, right? Is that what your saying, that the exiled or people that have been lucky enough to escape are making up the stories?

Is that what your saying?

Well I give up, which laughingly is the same tactic Saddam and Clinton use. Just keep denying, keep lying, keep distorting the facts, keep asking what the definition of IS is, keep dancing until all finally get to damn tired to keep going or some other crisis takes the eyes of you..

I am just tired of arguing with a wall and wont respond so I give up.... You are in good decent company buddy, just keep dancin'

M