News Focus
News Focus
icon url

hispeedsoul

06/14/12 4:14 PM

#118098 RE: JPGetty #118096

As was said in my prior post

"Who says Scott did not get their permission? The guys in the photos knew they would be posted. Merle said someone was trying to track down the driver of the car. The driver of the cars in the photo has a right to privacy. They don't need to be bothered. First, they probably have no information and second they cannot share information if they had any. I'm sure Scott took down the rest of the photos to be more proactive to prevent anymore intrusion or to prevent other shareholders from harassing. And yes, it is harassing. The photos have already served the purpose regardless of taking them down. Scott showed they are making progress, and most people took notice of it. Moving on.....
icon url

JKenyon

06/14/12 4:19 PM

#118099 RE: JPGetty #118096

We don't know the answers to any of those questions.

If we knew who were in the pictures then we might be able to figure out who SRSR is trying to make a deal with.
icon url

StochasticsRule

06/15/12 2:58 PM

#118141 RE: JPGetty #118096

I find it really sad and pathetic that shareholders took their perceived "DD" too far and caused SRSR to remove the pictures. That kind of harassment doesn't help the company at all and makes all of us look bad. The immaturity of the shareholders that did this is detrimental to the company. It makes me sad.