gem: Here agin i fully agree with you. My (LOGIC) thinkin is that the HM is the bird in hand. Which means that i have a window of understanding which has blocked the ideas that the ALASKA program must have enticed much more behind the scenes action than i am aware of. That is why i went to the "QUALITY" of the source of the plan of attack, and that was at the MLV firm in NYC. Big things happen in the "BIG APPLE"! However imo,JB may have one finger on the trigger to change targets and work all the more feverntly in the HM. They said multiple holes and different poriffs in AK, i dont like that idea as many said before get 1 of the best PORIFFS and drill it out,ZTEM makes is easier than ever. That string of LOGIC then tessl me exactly what you said in your POST,so we go fullcircle and JB&BOD see many more partners that want to see PORIFFs in AK meaning more than 1 party. Otherwise no GEOLOGIST is going to go yon and yon punching out holes,that goes against all of my DDing studies. This would mean they likely have what are/is called a GEBTLEMANS aggrement on many of the poriffs at BCSP. Why punck a hole and not have a prospect,when JB has plenty to show for alone in AZ. So there has to be urgent reasons to drill multiple PORIFFS on the BCSP. I just thank all said and done that the Hay Mountain is gonna be as big as we ever could ask for,Phelps Dodge and all. My mind is spinnin like an industrial washing machine,trying to get all of the DIRT out for final rinse cycle.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
