Replies to post #44420 on Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc (KBLB)

[King Bolaba]

He obviously has done no detailed research on the science. Just a quick look at the chart.

[bananarama]

Peach,

What does June have anything to do with where we are? When you deal with a developmental stock (like KBLB), you have to be patient. Good news will come, but you and others need PATIENCE!

This is a complex business, and this company has come a long long way in a short time. Now that we are nearing actual "earnings," this is not the time to throw your hands up in the air and want immediate gratification.

If you want that, then you are in the wrong stock. If you truly understand the potential this company has, then you should be happy, buy more, and hold on for the ride. It will certainly get more and more exciting as the year wears on.

[rayovac812]

Are you a trader or investor?

This is a reasonable, third party high level view of this stock.

Really? Anyone that looks at charts such as this are pure traders. It is like buying a cloths line to go repelling. It is simply the wrong tool if you are talking to investors. Investors do not look entirely at the price of a stock. Investors look at the story and timeline. Timeline is far too early to give up as I said. I will not be concerned until negotiations go more than 6 months. That would be sometime in November.

Too many times articles like this are setups for those seeking cheap shares or influencing thinking. I know hedge fund OWNERS that will tell you as much. You cannot believe what you read. I am telling you these folks pay to have things said...and pay could simply mean scratching someones back with a cut-up article or returning a favor. It is how things work.

You can have whatever exit strategy you like. But you should not listen to what anyone tells you you should do. You should have your own rules. If you don't, then you are being very unwise. Whatever discipline you use, you should not be telling people what it is or what you think as it would not serve your own interests. So be suspicious or very critical. There is a great chance you are being set up. If you sell shares, then you trade and are trying to influence in line with your own activities. If you are holding as an investor, then what are you holding for....AND you should not be caring what some nobody thinks by looking at a stupid chart. What are you?

It's looking more and more like the answer is no.

Really.... a third party view of KBLB? One thing I know, there are very few unbiased articles in the investment world. That makes them mostly low level views. Science articles are unbiased and facts based. So lets try to stay real on what is high level and low. Kim plays into your hands by not playing like the typical pink....but I like being treated like an adult. What you seek will not come until it gets here and we all have to grow up. A lawyer is going to be quiet until NDA's are fulfilled by signed contracts. It is looking more and more like KBLB is going to make huge money. A lawyer will not tell you that either. We all have to be convinced ourselves, and I am. You know how KBLB operates yet expect information? You got information in early May. You will probably hear something in June.....but to say there have been no updates???? Going to Techtextil and getting updates is getting updates.

Now instead of telling me that something is reasonable, tell me why you think it is reasonable.... and high level...LOL. I have given you reasoning for the exact opposite.

[ZincFinger]

To call it a "reasonable view" is not only off the mark, it's not even in the ballpark when they dismiss a peer reviewed publication in one of the most preeminent journals of all (the PNAS) that PROVES with full scientific methodology that the silk is far superior to silkworm silk and very close to spider silk in many properties with a comment like "Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc. (OTC:KBLB) has developed , they claim, a super silk they call Monster Silk"

"They claim"! It's not only not reasonable, it's flagrantly misleading! PROOF in a peer reviewed scientific journal is not a mere claim and dismissing it as such shows either total ignorance of even the most basic fundamentals of a stock they are pretending to analyze or an outright intent to mislead.

The report is garbage, pure and simple.