Just thought I'd bring up these thoughts again since they are still the same even though I'm not spending much time on the board going back and forth:
Companies with NOTHING and higher share structure trade higher than this. Never rule anything out in the crazy OTC.
It really just depends on what is happening when volume is coming in. Yes this did lose it's momo and confidence when the AS was increased twice. The ATM'ers could have been easily chewed through and left in the dust if those increases would not have happened at that exact instance that made momo guys go buh-bye. Do not underestimate the amount that momo guys were holding which is a lot of the selling we saw with the discovered increases. Really dumb timing. OR maybe BRILLIANT if the company was working on a buyback :-) ;-)
That means on the last run, we didn't go up any further than 6, but a whole lot has changed since then.
Everyone loves developments with BFHJ (including momo guys that left that I speak with everyday) but there is no doubt we need some clarity on a few fronts to bring confidence here.
The only thing holding people like me back from attacking that ask are questions about the share structure - NOT the share structure itself. Lots of the momo guys have a few left waiting for 100% announced clarity on SHARE-STRUCTURE to add again.
It's all relative to the price we are trading. Anyway about it, the market caps of all of the following examples are the same. I trade stocks everyday that are waaaaaaay higher than these price/AS examples with a whole lot less to offer than BFHJ!
These are ALL THE SAME - understand?
examples using current pps .0002
.0002 - 4.6 bil AS
.0004 - 2.3 bil AS
.0008 - 1.15 bil AS
.0016 - 575mil
.0032 - 287.5 mil
.0064 - 143.75 mil
.0128 - 71.8 mil
.0256 - 35.9 mil
.0512 - 17.96 mil
.1024 - 8.98 mil
we are getting laughable now since companies with this low of an AS pretty much don't exist.
can you imagine a 10 cent stock with under 10 mil AS or a nickle stock with under 20 mil with news and revs like this has? LOLOL BANK BANK BANK BANK BANK - it's all the same with where we are.
I'm cool with the Share structure. I personally would just like clear concise addressing with the co they are fine with it too and it is staying where it is or even better (DECREASING TO PREVIOUS LEVELS)
Development press about what the company is doing business wise is FABULOUS, but until they address their share structure by informing us of the gameplan with this, I agree, we are pretty much trading in this range.
I'm good no matter what they decide, I just want to know what that is.
If they commit to keeping it here, I'm buying more AT THE ASK.
.0002 - $920k market cap UNDERVALUED
.0003 - $1.38 market cap UNDERVALUED
Not that I'm advocating or suggesting a RS, but my personal gameplan in the event they did announce one (everyone always needs to keep their mind open and have plan). Keep my position already accumulated, and then LOAD THE FREAKING BOAT at .0001 when the freaked out people panic to sell (market cap would be $460k ROFLLLLLLL - I'd be a piranha ) because I hear their promise to not decrease shareholder value and their fundamentals rock my world and I will make a ton of money on those, I am confident.
Anyway about it I'm very very very good with share-structure.
Just keeping it real!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
