Well, that is a very reasonable explaination for not going with BG, if it is indeed the case. They should just say so. Making both sets of geologic data available would also make perfect sense and show transparency and intent to get the best possible deals in place for shareholders. It would build trust, which we are in dire need of. However, Rehoboth lease doesn't seem to be doing that well...So BG must have been pretty bad(didn't seem so in the PR) but don't they do all that DD upfront before signing contracts and announcing PR's?
Anyhow, moving forward... what's in store for us? They keep talking about a Riverton JV contingent upon a 1.5 million deposit/investment, is that happening... What about Oklahoma leases from Texas Energy? $5 or 10 Mil getting released, how are they going to spend it.... We've got to get some buzz going!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
