I find this error, and so many like it we see from other analysts and professionals we see in print from brokerage houses, alpha, fool, Cramer, and on and on shockingly careless. Stupid. This stupidity bodes well for anybody who has even basic information correct.
In the case of McMinn, her 18% dilution error, when corrected in her sophisticated model, corrects the pps projection up somehwere from 0 to 18%. This would make her pps target $17-$20. Up to a $3 error in pps target. And she's the best?
On his worst day, IIIverson provides far more value to this board. The others on the board who focus on the science and management are as good if not better. And just about everybody knows about the warrants being resolved.
If she's the best, you have to wonder how much worse Wall street can get. Shows that Cramer could not make money in an honest world, and why he doesn't trade now.
It's not just how smart you are, you have to make good decisions also.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
