That'll give Bob a blast from the past if he scans the thread list -g-
No doubt. There are many examples.
.... the stock crashed and burned of course, quite quickly in this case [but the office restrooms were well appointed and kept sparkly clean!] <-- that's an in joke, maybe you had to be there
Yes, you had to be there. I don't know what you're talking about -- and I know exactly what you're talking about. I've been around a few mines that crashed and burned in my time. One in particular, I was installing some equipment on a contract basis, whilst the operation went to hell in a handbasket. That was well before chat lines, but it had its flock of faithful. Until the end suddenly came.
Under no conditions ever would a responsible message board company set up censored boards to be operated by people looking to pump their stock to suckers. Period.
I can't imagine why. I'm no attorney, but the legal implications are not to be ignored. As well, some outfits do try that route, with a stunning lack of success.
'If ya don't know the Rocketeers, ya don't know Jack' ..... yeah, i guess ya had to be there -ggg-
I suppose. Jose say can you see, by the Rocket's Red glare?
The best response on the subject was Matt's not too far back. I'm paraphrasing badly, but...longs have an interest in a stock because they own shares and post positive comments. Those who post negative comments may well be short. Therefore they have an equal interest in a stock.
What I find sad is the number of posts I encounter that say, let's put the participation of XXX to a vote. It's the democratic way, after all.
It most certainly is not the democratic way.
Regards,
WillP
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
