wait who is sammy?
I read the piece, it speaks to your beliefs.
but any piece which uses the label "state terror" for Israeli action is de facto making an argument that Israel would be doing exactly what it is doing if there had never been a suicide bomber instead of over 90 in two years. If the Israelis were terrorizing thir population two years ago instead of Sharon's family shopping in Ramallah, the writer would get some respect, but as it is he does not. And dont think I like flechete weapons either, but at this point I do not know what is propaganda and what is not other than labels which purloin the veracity of events
Therefore I immediately cross label the writer as a propagandist.
Meanwhile I agree that the whole thing seems fishy.
there just is not enough data and I do not beleive oil is the reason either. It has to be something to do with keeping the present status quo
Tell me why the Anthrax releases in the congress had the same silica as was imported by Iraq