That's your deflection to my SDVI question? To use faulty logic, and explain away transgressions by pointing out negative qualities in others?
Really? Let me put it to you this way.. you (as in yourself and others who do this) can't tout SDVI as being "different" from other pinks, and worth investing in, on one hand, and with the other hand use negative quality of pinksheet stocks in general, to DEFEND SDVI.
It's hypocritical