Hey Capt,
You know, you're right. The Ref took a lot of very aggressive ridicule over his effort to let us know what was going on and was considered to be a liar that was making things up. Turns out he was right all along. Have you got any ideas as to why or what strategy would cause the truth to be treated as such "taboo" when it only proves success for GEC? Aren't sales considered a good thing? The only thing that I can see that has been acheived by this is that it falsley values the price of the stocks at a lower than reallistic value. Who or why would shareholders benefit from this "strategy" of deceptive bussiness success? I know it isn't me as a shareholder that has waited years for the prices to rise.
Ref, I owe you an apology for listening to the other posts that made you out as a madman.
Anyone out there is very welcome to try to explain or comment on this disturbing behaviour. Don't bother if you are only going to lie or make excuses. I do go back as far as I need to in past posts to find inconsistancies in what people say here.
Ecoman, would you like to start the show with you're "no more than fourty acre" post that three of us proved you to be wrong on?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
