At this point in the life cycle of FASC, I believe that FASC should still be reporting sales of ones, two and threes. Based on the past history of FASC with little/no reported revenues, those events are still material (IMHO). A reasonably, prudent investor of FASC shares would find that information at this point to be extremely helpful in making any purchase or sale decisions. As these types of sales become more commonplace and FASC transitions into reporting net income on a regular and continuous basis, then yes larger scale orders start to become a material event and the smaller scale orders, while still important, become more of a staple type revenue production.
The candidates that you point out for large scale orders; PWR, Sundrop, QL, MnVap may involve projects that are still in the infancy stages and may never come to fruition. If that is the yardstick upon which we now measure communication with shareholders, we may never hear another word from management.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
