Unless you can disprove the 3rd sentence of the body of the article ..
"Sources close to the talks told Haaretz that the Iranians are demanding an American and European
commitment not to carry out a military attack on their country as long as the talks continue."
your comment has no basis .. sure, we all have trouble with "sources",
and with 'headlines', yet it's often used as oxygen as you know.
Though not expanded on .. how could it be? .. it's not unbelievable, in fact it's
totally believable, and was dealt with in the article as much as would be expected.
As an example of a 'misleading' headline it isn't exactly a glaring fraud, as many are.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
