News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BonelessCat

04/09/12 12:31 PM

#59153 RE: interested11 #59152

All of your questions are easily answered in public and EDGAR filings at the local, state and federal levels. Further proof is not reasonable. When you suggest a walk through with camera, that is a completely unreasonable request since I doubt any corporation with sensitive proprietary production knowledge would agree to such a thing from any investor.

Building permits are accessible, use licenses are public filings, FDA filings for the INDA can be accessed, and finally, when stated in EDGAR compliant quarterly reports and material events, officers are fully liable for any misleading information.

This isn't a paper mill startup with a novel way of boiling fiber.
icon url

Drano

04/09/12 1:17 PM

#59154 RE: interested11 #59152

That is a complete mischaracterization. Your claim is that when management says something, they are not to be trusted and whatever they say needs some kind of magical independent verification (as if that is possible). My statement is that management does not dare lie unless they want to be sued by shareholders and potentially get in trouble with the (admittedly toothless) SEC.

Please stop misquoting me and mischaracterizing my posts.