I meant a Markman on the reexamined patents. PTSC had a GOOD Markman in 2006 then the patents got reexmained with 17 requests for reexam and they were somewhat changed. Although patents in reexam are considered valid good luck convincing a jury an accused infringer should pay. Courts have stayed patent infringement cases pending the results of reexams. EDIG would need another court case accusing infringers on the reexamined patents and would need to win to collect significant license fees imo. That is where I hope PTSC is right now. The patents survived reexam and they are in a court case awaiting a Markman ruling.