News Focus
News Focus
icon url

tradewell

08/17/05 5:06 PM

#154771 RE: Charlie48 #154761

Your arguement makes perfect sense but is only surmised, and can not be proven without verified share counts. It is also what lets doubt enter into the equation, and could be what is allowing shorting, or even naked shorting, but this still can not be proven either without a share count. Wihout the share count, the unknown variable is too large to move the stock through either scenario of dilution or short manipulation and the price sits in this range. So I give my analogy of today's trading action strictly to today's trading events, as that is all the relevent info I have to go by, right or wrong. -IMO-TW

icon url

rickhan

08/17/05 5:09 PM

#154776 RE: Charlie48 #154761

Frank has publically stated they are buying back stock, and that they are absolutely not diluting.
They would be really stupid things to say if not true--they would put him in jail.
And Frank is not stupid.
There is something strange going on, but I don't think it's from Q's side.