News Focus
News Focus
icon url

wall_street61

03/14/12 5:54 PM

#72345 RE: was justavoice #72344

I take all the compliments I can get....even the back-handed ones, lol
icon url

originalthought22

03/14/12 9:46 PM

#72349 RE: was justavoice #72344

I like frank, honest opinions. I tend to like Wall Street bashing QSGI, because he is normally right in regards to his financial or business analysis. Believe me, the potential profit that could be made off this POS is not blurring my view in regards to anything.

What I don't like is completely wrong statements about possible libel lawsuits and spelling the word Hearsay incorrectly, and I won't take any legal procedural advice from somebody who makes either of those mistakes.

MTD's are dismissed over 90% of the time, and my money will always be on the Plaintiff to win that round. Nobody besides the attorneys working on these cases, who are able to view the discovery and facts, knows how a judge will rule on a case and anybody who claims they do so beforehand is self-centered, especially if they rave about it afterwards. Some may have a clue by looking at judge's track record, but that takes time, money, and knowledge most normal investors don't have, and they are still guessing.

Finally, I don't need any briefing in court proceedings. I've been involved in some massive civil lawsuits and understand the BK process.
icon url

originalthought22

03/30/12 6:41 PM

#72537 RE: was justavoice #72344

"he knows a whole lot about BK and court proceedings. If he says something, I would pay attention and learn more about what he is talking about. He is not always right but I personally do not bet against him." -justavoice

Wall Street was wrong about the Complaint not being re-filed this week. I would personally never bet on anybody's opinion regarding litigation outcomes or re-filing cases unless they clerked for a judge presiding over the trial, had cases in front of that judge in the past, or are personally working on the case. He provided no specific details to his two guesses regarding this case, so his opinion is virtually worthless.