Replies to post #73945 on Bravada International Ltd (BRAV)

[Sean D]

I believe the first statement of his post answers that."positive speculation does not harm a company" A company has no interest in the negative speculative because it is not supplemental to the company's growth and vision set forth by the company's CEO. There are plenty here who believe in the future plans of Bravada. Those who interest themselves in shorting the company are of little importance to Bravada when compared to those shareholders who are looking to gain from the company's advancement. Hence, Danny's repetitive statements addressing the eventual growth of shareholder value

[fear ceoil]

For a more complicated situation like that, it would need to be decided by a court.

But with what I wrote about concerning negative statements of fact that are proven to be untrue, the courts will most likely deem them to be defamatory. Even if they were meant for a "positive" outcome, the statements on face value can be argued as causing more harm than good. If 10 years from now someone comes across the negative post, how is he/she suppose to know the context they were given in? He/she will take them at face value as a negative aspect about the company.

IMO
Best to all.