News Focus
News Focus
icon url

SoxFan

01/31/03 1:09 PM

#3807 RE: Jar #3805

> but if this is humanity's basic problem,

I would have some issue with this being humanities basic problem. I believe our basic problem is that we are animals and our intelligence has evolved much faster than our basic instincts. We are not in the survival of the fittest mode yet we continue to act like it.

icon url

brainlessone

01/31/03 3:37 PM

#3821 RE: Jar #3805

One question I always had is if some people are born with original sin and some are not.

everyone has a different metabolism and no diet works for all.

In mice, the elimination of a single gene, the fos gene, removes the entire nurturing response of the mother to the new born. the mamas do not suckle, they do not sleep with the babies and treat them as if they did not exist

icon url

jbennett53

01/31/03 5:58 PM

#3840 RE: Jar #3805

Jar, I am not sure that I agreed to anything. At the moment one definite question I have is why you said "between humanity and God." Why not use the descriptive word that is used most in the Bible? Simply, man.
Which brings up one serious problem that I have with the Bible. That is in the way that women are treated. Truly is the Bible the literal word of God or the chauvinist scribes who put it to text?
You believe that you are guilty of sin in the eyes of God. I do not deny or ascribe to your belief.
My church tells me to be accepting of others faith and not to mock, shame or attempt to instill in them the terror of Hellfire and Brimstone because they do not believe as I.
The Bible is full of ancient alliterations that the meaning of which can be interpreted in different ways especially thousands of years after the fact. Does not the purveyor of fear ever have a twitch that maybe God is watching and will judge harshly the fright he spreads while in his mortal tent?