Replies to post #59261 on California Grapes International, Inc (CAGR)

[Highland]

Again..I blame it on the attorney..but I could be wrong...If Frank had Chinese leases, and I am taking your word for that because I honestly wasn't around when Frank was running things, I would think it would not matter that it was late! No benefit to anyone that I can think off..just a chance for Jeff to get a new attorney! I think I remember us debating even their attorney and whether he was qualified to give an opinion or something like that...I think that's what I have been trying to say..there has just been so much tuff to sift through..and all the while...CAGR has been trying to either sell wine or sell shares and I don't know of anyone, including myself, that is qualified to answer that question yet!

[dh30067]

During the time period when the share count went up 244,764,413 and no funds were recorded on the books and there was no itemization of these share issues they were non reporting. That's the benefit.

I can't imagine that there would be any benefit to CAGR in delaying the process.