News Focus
News Focus
icon url

DewDiligence

02/23/12 1:12 PM

#137697 RE: RockRat #137696

It was, IMO, a contradiction Dr. Sherman would have preferred to avoid (or had the opportunity to clarify), but reasonable people may disagree. Clearly, the BioCentury interviewer did not think there was anything amiss, but I doubt that he was paying close attention to the details.
icon url

DewDiligence

02/24/12 3:45 PM

#137813 RE: RockRat #137696

Does an indication have to appear in the Indications and Usage section of an FDA label for a “use” patent for such an indication to be enforcible under Hatch-Waxman? That’s the issue in the Yasmin case discussed at http://www.fdalawblog.net/fda_law_blog_hyman_phelps/2012/02/the-yasmin-case-is-it-conceivable-or-not-that-hatch-waxman-method-patent-infringement-lawsuits-are-limited-to-information.html .

A similar question could arise vis-à-vis the 351(k) pathway for FoB’s, although there is no repository analogous to the Orange Book for that pathway.