News Focus
News Focus
icon url

M_T_Pockets

02/14/12 11:48 PM

#39497 RE: p1928 #39495

Abandons the property? That would mean the bond never gets returned. And the environmental plans HAVE been approved. They deal with the old settling ponds. That work has already been started, last September. The cost IS known. It is negligible, compared to the bond.
It entails placing sand and tailings over the old pond floor, a new non-permeable liner, and covering the liner with more earth. (A layered series of sand, rocks, and topsoil, all planted with new wild grasses. Even the type and amount of grasses have been determined.)
You have a lot of catching up to do, P. I suggest you go to the DRMS website and start reading the documents there. It will answer a lot of the assumptions you are making.
The links are in the stickies above.
Good luck.
icon url

ficose

02/15/12 8:54 AM

#39509 RE: p1928 #39495

Hi p1928,

If you're used to only relying on PR's and the SEC for public record, we are really fortunate in our case that we have the DRMS site that is chock full of info when trying to DD this thing.

http://mining.state.co.us/

They have mining data for the surrounding mines and the AM3 the company filed has detailed drawings of the work proposed. You should check it out if you have questions - all public record.