why would: they prefer negative moves to our economy at every turn.
simple... they can make more money from other economies easier than from ours. And they do. Have you noticed the export of our industrial capabilities for about 30 years?
negative moves would seem to be counter-productive to their cause....??????
nope.. not even close, GEO. Ever hear of Walmart? The business thieve's cause is looting our treasury and lining their pockets. Your brand of capitalism. Halliburton ring a bell?
just as the expansion of the public sector and welfare state is the Dems/Obamacrats game plan....not the Repubs.....
all evidence to the contrary... in the last 10 or 15 years, which party expanded the number of government employees, and which one actually reduced it? So, show, with actual examples how the democrats have expanded the public sector and increased the welfare state? You can't, because it is just a wing nut myth. Bush's unfunded medicare prescription expansion has cost us way more than what has actually been spent on the Health Care Initiative. You need to back up your stuff with more than bluster to have credibility. Clinton reduced the number of federal employees by about 10%, and since then it has been mostly stagnant, even when you consider the number of uniformed military personnel.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
