Trucker, Sometimes you have to have facts or at least SOME BASIS to back up your statements. I based my comments in post 2702 on this statement from a former board member. It should be noted that the current board did not make any assertion that this statement was false.(from recent 8k)
"I felt you handled the recent testing failures of the FTV and IVT very professionally at the BOD. These repetitious failures were extremely troubling to me because, I believe, some minority shareholders thought Torvec had a near "miracle cure" for global fuel consumption ... using new technology that costs only fraction of the price of current technology. Well, Torvec's testing engineers certainly could not prove this to the BOD. Instead of double-digit improvements to fuel economy with a million-mile transmission, we were presented with less-than-single digit improvements with questionable statistical validity, and a constantly failing transmission. We almost made it to the confessional - some arguments expressed justifiable frustration and fear about Torvec's inability to prove its claims. Other voices heralded old invalid test results and claimed that the Federal government's test procedures were all wrong. You were moving the BOD to a moment of truth on all this, and I felt you were really doing your job."
My post was in responce 2696:
"False info IVT not dead issue eom"
The individual who made this post has never offered any fact or basis on which this statement was made.
Readers can come to their own conclusions.....
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
