Richard....
"The suppositions in my second argument are fatal to your theory because it is necessary to show those suppositions are false in order for your theory to stand. Or, to be more specific, in order to prove that evolution theory contradicts the second law of thermodynamics, it is necessary to show that the temporary reduction of entropy in living things is not paid for by an even greater increase in entropy elsewhere."
Hmmm - Your suppositions are just that - suppositions. I see no need to do anything with them. They are suppositions, with nothing to back them up - first show me that they are valid, which logic tells me is doubtful. To do so, you will have to account for not just humans, but each step along the evolutionary scale, and factor in population increases and decreases, changes in climate, etc. Personally, I am not equipped to make such a study, but neither am I inclined to take your suppositions at face value as scientific fact.
Like I said before, neither creation science nor evolution stand or fall based on the second law of thermodynamics (it is immaterial to creation science), and I suspect we are at an impasse here. But you are more than welcome to attempt to establish your claim. Unfortunately, I would have to get others with more scientific background to assess your "proof".
mlsoft
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
