I suspect the Hatch-Waxman argument is going nowhere fast, In the closing moments one Judge ask the Amp. lawyer if their argument would make all mfg control patents useless in this case.
At the end of the discourse the Judge said "That is not the purpose of Hatch-Waxman. I was there , I wrote that"
Very little time spent on harm.
Edit: I thought the MNTA lawyer did a poor job this point getting tied up on whether of not the FDA called out the MNTA test. But at the end he finally got around to the obvious argument that the Amp view would invalidate all mfg patents in the drug industry.