Well you were certainly very wrong about the one that you just cited.
Be specific about something improper that you've discovered in conjunction with this effort and I expect that we'll find that it, too, is merely the product of a vivid imagination and poor reading habits:
"FACT: someone has been busy in regards to this issue re: the sec correspondence .. fyi i've pulled up the sec website on JBI on a weekly basis for well over 1 year *specific* to public correspondence noted by the sec and *dates*"
One can only hide so much nonsense under the camouflage of asterisks and pretty colors.